G AND C INFRA INNOVATIONS Versus UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE (DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE), NEW DELHI, THE COMMISSIONER, STATE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX DEPT., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, THE GST COUNCIL, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, NEW DELHI, THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER, KOCHI, THE NODAL OFFICER, GOODS AND SERVICES TAX NETWORK, NEW DELHI AND THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, KOCHI
GST
2018 (8) TMI 973 – KERALA HIGH COURT – 2018 (18) G. S. T. L. 28 (Ker.)
KERALA HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 22-6-2018
W. P. (C. ) No. 20287 of 2018
GST
MR. P. B .SURESH KUMAR, J.
\nFor The PETITIONER(S) : SRI. A. KUMAR, SRI.P.J.ANILKUMAR, SMT G. MINI (1748) AND SRI.P. S. SREE PRASAD
\nFor The RESPONDENT (S) : ADV. SRI.N.NAGARESH, ASSISTAN<\/p>\n
= = = = = = = =<\/p>\n
Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong> = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n AN-1 uploaded by the petitioner and as such, they are unable to take credit of the input tax available to them. The petitioner, therefore, seeks appropriate directions in this regard in the writ petition. = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong> = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" G AND C INFRA INNOVATIONS Versus UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE (DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE), NEW DELHI, THE COMMISSIONER, STATE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX DEPT., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, THE GST COUNCIL, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, NEW DELHI, THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER, KOCHI, THE NODAL OFFICER, GOODS AND SERVICES TAX NETWORK, NEW DELHI AND THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, … Continue reading “G AND C INFRA INNOVATIONS Versus UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE (DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE), NEW DELHI, THE COMMISSIONER, STATE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX DEPT., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, THE GST COUNCIL, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-13280","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13280","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=13280"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13280\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=13280"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=13280"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=13280"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
For full text:-Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n
\n2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Government Pleader as also the learned Central Government Counsel.
\nHaving regard to the facts and circumstances of the case as also the orders passed in similar writ petitions, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition permitting the petitioner to prefer a representation pointing out the grievance before the additional eighth respondent, the Nodal Officer appointed to resolve the issues of this nature. Ordered accordingly. If the petitioner prefers a representation <\/p>\n
For full text:-Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n