{"id":12949,"date":"2018-07-27T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2018-07-26T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2018-07-27T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2018-07-26T18:30:00","slug":"diamond-food-products-versus-assistant-state-tax-officer-state-gst-department-palakkad","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/?p=12949","title":{"rendered":"DIAMOND FOOD PRODUCTS Versus ASSISTANT STATE TAX OFFICER, STATE GST DEPARTMENT, PALAKKAD"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>DIAMOND FOOD PRODUCTS Versus ASSISTANT STATE TAX OFFICER, STATE GST DEPARTMENT, PALAKKAD<br \/>GST<br \/>2018 (8) TMI 67 &#8211; KERALA HIGH COURT &#8211; TMI<br \/>KERALA HIGH COURT &#8211; HC<br \/>Dated:- 27-7-2018<br \/>W. P. (C). No. 25030 of 2018 (C) <br \/>GST<br \/>MR. DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, J.<br \/>\nFor The Petitioner : Sri. P.M. Poulose And Sri.P.D. Broono<br \/>\nFor The Respondent : Smt. Thushara James<br \/>\nJUDGMENT<br \/>\nThe petitioner, a partnership firm, purchased certain machinery in Chennai and was transporting it. On 20th July 2018, the respondent authority intercepted the vehicle at Valayar Check Post. Though the driver produced a copy of the e-way bill, he did not carry with him the original or duplicate invoice. The respondent ordered physical inspection of the goods and document<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\"><strong>Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong><BR>For full text:-<a href=\"https:\/\/www.taxtmi.com\/caselaws?id=364595\">Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>DIAMOND FOOD PRODUCTS Versus ASSISTANT STATE TAX OFFICER, STATE GST DEPARTMENT, PALAKKADGST2018 (8) TMI 67 &#8211; KERALA HIGH COURT &#8211; TMIKERALA HIGH COURT &#8211; HCDated:- 27-7-2018W. P. (C). No. 25030 of 2018 (C) GSTMR. DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, J. For The Petitioner : Sri. P.M. Poulose And Sri.P.D. Broono For The Respondent : Smt. Thushara James &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/?p=12949\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;DIAMOND FOOD PRODUCTS Versus ASSISTANT STATE TAX OFFICER, STATE GST DEPARTMENT, PALAKKAD&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-12949","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12949","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=12949"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12949\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=12949"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=12949"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=12949"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}