{"id":12783,"date":"2018-07-19T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2018-07-18T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2018-07-19T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2018-07-18T18:30:00","slug":"m-s-piccadily-holiday-resorts-limited-versus-union-of-india-and-others","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/?p=12783","title":{"rendered":"M\/s Piccadily Holiday Resorts Limited Versus Union of India and others"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>M\/s Piccadily Holiday Resorts Limited Versus Union of India and others<br \/>GST<br \/>2018 (7) TMI 1637 &#8211; PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT &#8211; TMI<br \/>PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT &#8211; HC<br \/>Dated:- 19-7-2018<br \/>CWP-25719-2017 <br \/>GST<br \/>MR. SURYA KANT AND MR. SUDIP AHLUWALIA, JJ.<br \/>\nFor The Petitioner : Mr.Jagmohan Bansal, Advocate<br \/>\nFor The Respondent : Mr. Sunish Bindlish, Advocate<br \/>\nORDER<br \/>\nSURYA KANT, J.(ORAL)<br \/>\nThe petitioner is primarily aggrieved by the order dated 12.09.2017 passed by the Additional Commissioner, GST &#038; Central Excise Commissionerate, Chandigarh. Vide the aforesaid order, the levy of service tax amounting to Rs. 1,61,53,949\/- under Section 73 read with Section 174(2) of the CGST Act, 2017 has been confirmed . In addition, a penalty <\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\"><strong>Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong><BR>For full text:-<a href=\"https:\/\/www.taxtmi.com\/caselaws?id=364329\">Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>M\/s Piccadily Holiday Resorts Limited Versus Union of India and othersGST2018 (7) TMI 1637 &#8211; PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT &#8211; TMIPUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT &#8211; HCDated:- 19-7-2018CWP-25719-2017 GSTMR. SURYA KANT AND MR. SUDIP AHLUWALIA, JJ. For The Petitioner : Mr.Jagmohan Bansal, Advocate For The Respondent : Mr. Sunish Bindlish, Advocate ORDER SURYA KANT, &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/?p=12783\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;M\/s Piccadily Holiday Resorts Limited Versus Union of India and others&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-12783","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12783","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=12783"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12783\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=12783"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=12783"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=12783"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}