{"id":12762,"date":"2018-07-17T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2018-07-16T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2018-07-17T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2018-07-16T18:30:00","slug":"ratheesh-proprietor-m-s-kbm-agencies-versus-secretary-taxes-goods-service-tax-department-thiruvananthapuram-union-of-india-represented-by-the-union-secretary-new-delhi-the-agricultural-income-tax-stat","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/?p=12762","title":{"rendered":"RATHEESH PROPRIETOR, M\/s. KBM AGENCIES Versus SECRETARY TAXES, GOODS &#038; SERVICE TAX DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY THE UNION SECRETARY, NEW DELHI, THE AGRICULTURAL INCOME TAX &#038; STATE TAX OFFICER CIVIL STATION, ALAPP"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>RATHEESH PROPRIETOR, M\/s. KBM AGENCIES Versus SECRETARY TAXES, GOODS &#038; SERVICE TAX DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY THE UNION SECRETARY, NEW DELHI, THE AGRICULTURAL INCOME TAX &#038; STATE TAX OFFICER CIVIL STATION, ALAPPUZHA, THEMATIC NODAL OFFICER, THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, VAZHUCHERRY, THEMATIC NODAL OFFICER AND THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (APPEALS), VAZHUCHERRY<br \/>GST<br \/>2018 (7) TMI 1489 &#8211; KERALA HIGH COURT &#8211; TMI<br \/>KERALA HIGH COURT &#8211; HC<br \/>Dated:- 17-7-2018<br \/>W. P. (C) No. 21833 of 2018 (D) <br \/>GST<br \/>MR. DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, J.<br \/>\nFor The Petitioner : Adv. Sri. A. Krishnan<br \/>\nFor The Respondents : Sri. N. Nagaresh, Assistant Solicitor General And Smt Thushara James<br \/>\nJUDGMENT<br \/>\nThe petitioner was a registered deale<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\"><strong>Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong><BR>For full text:-<a href=\"https:\/\/www.taxtmi.com\/caselaws?id=364181\">Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n<p>dal Officers is to follow. It reads:<br \/>\n 5. Nodal officers and identification of issues<br \/>\n 5.1 GSTN, Central and State government would appoint nodal officers in requisite number to address the problem a taxpayer faces due to glitches, if any, in the Common Portal. This would be publicized adequately.<br \/>\n 5.2 Taxpayers shall make an application to the field officers or the nodal officers where there was a demonstrable glitch on the Common Portal in relation to an identified issue, due to which the due process as envisaged in law could not be completed on the Common Portal.<br \/>\n 5.3 Such an application shall enclose evidences as may be needed for an identified issue to establish bona fide attempt on the part of the taxpayer to comply with the due p<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\"><strong>Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong><BR>For full text:-<a href=\"https:\/\/www.taxtmi.com\/caselaws?id=364181\">Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>RATHEESH PROPRIETOR, M\/s. KBM AGENCIES Versus SECRETARY TAXES, GOODS &#038; SERVICE TAX DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY THE UNION SECRETARY, NEW DELHI, THE AGRICULTURAL INCOME TAX &#038; STATE TAX OFFICER CIVIL STATION, ALAPPUZHA, THEMATIC NODAL OFFICER, THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, VAZHUCHERRY, THEMATIC NODAL OFFICER AND THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (APPEALS), VAZHUCHERRYGST2018 (7) TMI 1489 &#8211; &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/?p=12762\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;RATHEESH PROPRIETOR, M\/s. KBM AGENCIES Versus SECRETARY TAXES, GOODS &#038; SERVICE TAX DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY THE UNION SECRETARY, NEW DELHI, THE AGRICULTURAL INCOME TAX &#038; STATE TAX OFFICER CIVIL STATION, ALAPP&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-12762","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12762","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=12762"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12762\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=12762"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=12762"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=12762"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}