M\/s Birla Corporation Ltd. Versus CGST, CC & CE, Jabalpur
Central Excise
2018 (7) TMI 1264 – CESTAT NEW DELHI – TMI
CESTAT NEW DELHI – AT
Dated:- 3-7-2018
Excise Appeal No. 50308\/2018 – FINAL ORDER NO. 52486\/2018
Central Excise
HON'BLE SHRI ANIL CHOUDHARY, MEMBER (JUDICIAL) And HON'BLE SHRI C.L. M AHAR, MEMBER (TECHNICAL)
\nFor the Petitioner : Shri Bipin Garg, Advocate
\nFor the Respondent : Shri N.R. Shaima, DR
\nORDER
\nPer Anil Choudhary:
\nThe issue involved in this appeal relates to objection by Revenue on taking of cenvat credit on the supplementary invoices, raised by M\/s. South Eastern Coalfields Ltd., for supply of coal made to the appellant.
\n2. Coal is one of the important input of the appellant used in the manuf<\/p>\n
= = = = = = = =<\/p>\n
Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong> = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n ges”, “clean energy cess” and “transit fee” in respect of coal earlier supplied by them. They had paid additional amount of duty & cess Rs. 1,62,39,182\/- and taken credit in their cenvat credit register on 31.07.2014, which, it appeared, are not valid documents for availing cenvat credit in terms of Rule 9(1) (b) of the CCR, 2004.Accordingly, a show cause notice No.42\/Commr\/CEX\/REWA\/2015-16 dated 3.7.2015 was issued to the appellant and subsequently proceeding was finalized by the adjudicating authority vide order-in-original no.58\/JC\/CEX\/JBP\/2016-17 dated 28.03.2017 wherein Cenvat Credit was disallowed and ordered to recover the same along with interest and penalty. = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong> = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n sputed by the Revenue, the fact of deposit of such duty collected by SECL, with the Govt. exchequer. = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong> = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" M\/s Birla Corporation Ltd. Versus CGST, CC & CE, JabalpurCentral Excise2018 (7) TMI 1264 – CESTAT NEW DELHI – TMICESTAT NEW DELHI – ATDated:- 3-7-2018Excise Appeal No. 50308\/2018 – FINAL ORDER NO. 52486\/2018Central ExciseHON'BLE SHRI ANIL CHOUDHARY, MEMBER (JUDICIAL) And HON'BLE SHRI C.L. M AHAR, MEMBER (TECHNICAL) For the Petitioner : Shri Bipin Garg, Advocate … Continue reading “M\/s Birla Corporation Ltd. Versus CGST, CC & CE, Jabalpur”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-12705","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12705","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=12705"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12705\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=12705"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=12705"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=12705"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
For full text:-Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n
\n4. Subsequently, Revenue issued another show cause notice on the ground t<\/p>\n
For full text:-Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n
\n5. Ld. Counsel appearing for the appellant argues that in view of the admitted facts that the demand of duty on such charges like royalty charges, etc. is subjudice before the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.4056-5064\/1999 (Mineral Area Development Vs. Steel Authority of India) and as such, the issue is debatable as to inclusion of aforesaid charges in the assessable value and as such, denial of cenvat credit by the Revenue on the ground of fraud, suppression is not tenable and have legs to stand.
\n6. Ld. AR for the Revenue have reiterated the findings of the impugned order.
\n7. Having considered the rival contentions of both the s<\/p>\n
For full text:-Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n