{"id":12548,"date":"2018-06-01T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2018-05-31T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2018-06-01T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2018-05-31T18:30:00","slug":"shreeji-adhesive-versus-cgst-ce-ujjain","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/?p=12548","title":{"rendered":"Shreeji Adhesive Versus CGST &#038; CE, Ujjain"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Shreeji Adhesive Versus CGST &#038; CE, Ujjain<br \/>Central Excise<br \/>2018 (7) TMI 519 &#8211; CESTAT NEW DELHI &#8211; TMI<br \/>CESTAT NEW DELHI &#8211; AT<br \/>Dated:- 1-6-2018<br \/>Appeal No. E\/50872\/2018-CU[DB] &#8211; A\/52268\/2018-EX[DB]<br \/>Central Excise<br \/>Mr. Bijay Kumar, Member (Technical) And Ms. Rachna Gupta, Member (Judicial)<br \/>\nRepresented by Ms. Priyanka Goel, Advocate for the Appellant.<br \/>\nRepresented by Shri R.K. Mishra, D.R. for the Respondent.<br \/>\nORDER<br \/>\nPer Rachna Gupta:<br \/>\nPresent is an appeal filed against the order dated 15.01.2018 vide which the Commissioner (Appeals) has confirmed the demand of duty on the value of subsidy received by the Appellant during the years 2010-11 to 2014-15. In addition, a penalty under Section 78 has also been confirmed. The factua<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\"><strong>Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong><BR>For full text:-<a href=\"https:\/\/www.taxtmi.com\/caselaws?id=363211\">Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Shreeji Adhesive Versus CGST &#038; CE, UjjainCentral Excise2018 (7) TMI 519 &#8211; CESTAT NEW DELHI &#8211; TMICESTAT NEW DELHI &#8211; ATDated:- 1-6-2018Appeal No. E\/50872\/2018-CU[DB] &#8211; A\/52268\/2018-EX[DB]Central ExciseMr. Bijay Kumar, Member (Technical) And Ms. Rachna Gupta, Member (Judicial) Represented by Ms. Priyanka Goel, Advocate for the Appellant. Represented by Shri R.K. Mishra, D.R. for the Respondent. &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/?p=12548\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Shreeji Adhesive Versus CGST &#038; CE, Ujjain&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-12548","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12548","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=12548"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12548\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=12548"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=12548"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=12548"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}