M\/s. Indian Maritime University Versus Commissioner of GST & Central Excise Chennai South Commissionerate (Vice-Versa)
Service Tax
2018 (7) TMI 265 – CESTAT CHENNAI – TMI
CESTAT CHENNAI – AT
Dated:- 12-4-2018
ST\/647\/2011, ST\/Misc. \/41113\/2017 and ST\/687\/2011 – Final Order Nos. 41126-41127\/2018
Service Tax
Ms. Sulekha Beevi C.S., Member (Judicial) and Shri Madhu Mohan Damodhar, Member (Technical)
\nShri M.N. Bharathi, Advocate for the Assessee
\nShri r. Subramanian, AC (AR) for Revenue
\nORDER
\nThe issue arising for consideration in both these appeals being the same, they were heard together and are disposed by this common order. The parties herein are referred to as assessee and Revenue for the sake of convenience.
\n2. Bri<\/p>\n
= = = = = = = =<\/p>\n
Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong> = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n interest and penalties. In appeal, Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the demand but however, set aside the penalties invoking section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994. Aggrieved the assessee has filed Appeal No.ST\/647\/2011 against confirmation of demand and department has filed Appeal No. ST\/687\/2011 against setting aside the penalties. = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong> = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n nder the definition of Commercial Training or Coaching Services and therefore the assessees are not liable to pay service tax. = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong> = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" M\/s. Indian Maritime University Versus Commissioner of GST & Central Excise Chennai South Commissionerate (Vice-Versa)Service Tax2018 (7) TMI 265 – CESTAT CHENNAI – TMICESTAT CHENNAI – ATDated:- 12-4-2018ST\/647\/2011, ST\/Misc. \/41113\/2017 and ST\/687\/2011 – Final Order Nos. 41126-41127\/2018Service TaxMs. Sulekha Beevi C.S., Member (Judicial) and Shri Madhu Mohan Damodhar, Member (Technical) Shri M.N. Bharathi, Advocate for … Continue reading “M\/s. Indian Maritime University Versus Commissioner of GST & Central Excise Chennai South Commissionerate (Vice-Versa)”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-12488","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12488","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=12488"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12488\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=12488"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=12488"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=12488"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
For full text:-Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n
\n3. On behalf of the assessee, ld. counsel Shri M.N. Bharathi submitted that the marine courses are approved by Government of India authorities and no further statutory approval is required. He submitted the activity would not fall under Commercial Coaching or Training Service. The ld. counsel explained that the National Maritime Academy was set up for the purpose of providing training to the officials \/ employees o<\/p>\n
For full text:-Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n
\n4. The ld. AR Shri R. Subramanian appearing for the department reiterated the findings in the impugned order. He also pleaded that the Commissioner (Appeals) has erred in setting aside the penalties.
\n5. Heard both sides.
\n6. We have perused the records carefully. The ld. counsel has produced copies of certificates issued by the assessee for various courses. Vide letter dated 21.8.1998, the Ministry of Surface Transport has granted approval for the course of 'Personal Safety and Social Responsibility'. Again by letter dated 8.10.1998, the Ministry of Surface Transport has granted approval to conduct 'Proficiency Me<\/p>\n
For full text:-Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n