Sher Singh Versus State of Punjab and others
GST
2018 (6) TMI 301 – PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT – TMI
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 31-5-2018
CWP No. 14649 of 2018 (O&M)
GST
MR. AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, ACJ AND MR. TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA, J.
\nFor The Petitioner : Mr. S.K.Choudhary, Advocate
\nORDER
\nTEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA, J.
\nTender inquiry for award of contract for parking at Sabzi Mandi under Market Committee, Gurdaspur was floated in the month of March, 2018.
\nInstant petition has been filed by the petitioner raising a grievance that in spite of the bid submitted by the petitioner being the most competitive yet the same has not been accepted and the tender has been allotted in favour of respondent No.5.
\nL<\/p>\n
= = = = = = = =<\/p>\n
Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong> = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n petitioner. = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong> = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Sher Singh Versus State of Punjab and othersGST2018 (6) TMI 301 – PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT – TMIPUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT – HCDated:- 31-5-2018CWP No. 14649 of 2018 (O&M) GSTMR. AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, ACJ AND MR. TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA, J. For The Petitioner : Mr. S.K.Choudhary, Advocate ORDER TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA, J. Tender … Continue reading “Sher Singh Versus State of Punjab and others”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-12052","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12052","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=12052"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12052\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=12052"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=12052"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=12052"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
For full text:-Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n
\nHaving heard counsel for the petitioner at length and having perused the pleadings on record, we are of the considered opinion that there is no merit in the petition and the same deserves to be dismissed.
\nIt has gone uncontroverted that as per Clause 8(v) of the Standard Bidding Document, each bidder had to submit copy of last filed GST return along with GST number.
\nIt is the case of the petitioner himself that GST number had not been furnished. Placed on record at Annexure P-5 is the order dated 11.05.2018 passed by the Executive Engineer (C) Punjab Mandi Board, Gurdaspur whereby the representation filed by the petitioner dated 25.03.2018 has been rejected and in which it has been specifically stated that as per record respo<\/p>\n
For full text:-Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n