M\/s Surinder Arora Enterprises Versus State of Punjab And others
GST
2018 (6) TMI 172 – PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT – 2018 (19) G. S. T. L. 423 (P & H)
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 21-5-2018
CWP-4180-2018 (O&M)
GST
MR. AJAY KUMAR MITTAL AND MR. TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA, JJ.
\nFor The Petitioners : Mr. Deepak Gupta, Advocate for Mr. Jagmohan Bansal, Advocate, Mr. J.S. Bedi, Advocate, Mr. Sandeep Goyal, Advocate, Mr. Shashank Shekhar, Advocate
\nFor The Respondents : Mr. Tajender K. Joshi, Advocate, Mr. Anil Chawla, Advocate, Mr. S.K. Sharma, Advocate Mr. Arun Gosain, Advocate & Mr. Sourabh Goel, Advocate
\nORDER
\nAJAY KUMAR MITTAL.ACJ (Oral)
\nThis order shall dispose of CWP Nos.4180, 4361, 4362,<\/p>\n
= = = = = = = =<\/p>\n
Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong> = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n , the petitioners have migrated to GST Act and due to which certain difficulties are being faced by them as well as by other assessees. In such circumstances, they have approached this Court for redressal of the grievances. = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong> = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n of the order. It is directed that in the event of representations being filed by the petitioners within the aforesaid period of five days from the date of receipt of the certified copy of the order, such representations as well as the representations already filed, shall be forwarded to the I.T. Redressal Committee concerned within next fifteen days after verification by the G.S.T.N and the Committee shall thereafter decide the same in terms of clause 5.4 of Circular No.39\/13\/2018-GST dated 3.4.2018 by passing a speaking order and after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the representations. The petitioners shall be entitled to lead any evidence to substantiate t<\/p>\n = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong> = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" M\/s Surinder Arora Enterprises Versus State of Punjab And othersGST2018 (6) TMI 172 – PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT – 2018 (19) G. S. T. L. 423 (P & H)PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT – HCDated:- 21-5-2018CWP-4180-2018 (O&M) GSTMR. AJAY KUMAR MITTAL AND MR. TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA, JJ. For The Petitioners : Mr. Deepak Gupta, … Continue reading “M\/s Surinder Arora Enterprises Versus State of Punjab And others”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-12034","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12034","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=12034"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12034\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=12034"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=12034"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=12034"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
For full text:-Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n
\n4. On 25.4.2018, it was brought to the notice of the Court that Delhi High Court had dealt with similar matters by a common order dated 09.04.2018 passed in W.P.(C) 1300\/2018 titled as Sare Realty Projects Private Limited Vs. Union of India & others and other connected petitions.
\n5. Accordingly, while adjourning these matters for today, petitioners were granted liberty to approach the Nodal Officer or the Redressal Committee concerned for redressal of their grievances in accordance with the Circular No.39\/13\/2018-GST d<\/p>\n
For full text:-Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n
For full text:-Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n