Sales Tax Bar Association (Regd,) & Another Versus Union Of India & Others
GST
2018 (6) TMI 171 – DELHI HIGH COURT – 2018 (16) G. S. T. L. 194 (Del.)
DELHI HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 15-5-2018
W. P. (C) 9575\/2017
GST
Sanjiv Khanna And Chander Shekhar, JJ.
\nFor the Petitioners : Mr. Puneet Agrawal, Mr. Sanjay Sharma, Mr. Rakesh Kumar Aggrawal, Mr. Puneet Rai, Mr.Purvi Sinha and Mr. Naveen Madan, Advs.
\nFor the Respondents : Mr. Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC with Mr. Abhigyan Siddhant and Mr. Abhimanyu Singh, Adv. for UOI\/R-1 Mr. Satyakam, Standing Counsel with Ms. Manpreet, L.A., DTT, for R-2 & R-3 Ms. Nidhi Mohan Parashar and Mr. Umang Kumar Singh, Advs. for R-4 Ms. Nitya Sharma, Adv. for GST Council
\nORDER
\nLd. Counsel for the<\/p>\n
= = = = = = = =<\/p>\n
Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong> = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n portal does not permit rectification of a return already filed. Rectification is to be made in the subsequent return. Nevertheless authorities are issuing notices to the assessees whenever rectification is made, treating rectification as a discrepancy between GSTR1 and GSTR3B. A large number of assessees are facing this problem. = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong> = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Sales Tax Bar Association (Regd,) & Another Versus Union Of India & OthersGST2018 (6) TMI 171 – DELHI HIGH COURT – 2018 (16) G. S. T. L. 194 (Del.)DELHI HIGH COURT – HCDated:- 15-5-2018W. P. (C) 9575\/2017 GSTSanjiv Khanna And Chander Shekhar, JJ. For the Petitioners : Mr. Puneet Agrawal, Mr. Sanjay Sharma, Mr. Rakesh … Continue reading “Sales Tax Bar Association (Regd,) & Another Versus Union Of India & Others”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-12033","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12033","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=12033"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12033\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=12033"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=12033"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=12033"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
For full text:-Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n
\nThe respondents would file response to the said assertions and allegations, in the form of status report. Prima facie we find merit in the submission that reply under the grievance mechanism should specifically deals with the issue raised and indicates the manner in which the same has been resolved and addressed.
\nThe Ld. Counsel for the respondent states that petitioner in spite of repeated e-mails have failed to <\/p>\n
For full text:-Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n