M\/s R.S. Steel Traders Versus State of Haryana and others
GST
2018 (5) TMI 1649 – PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT – 2018 (16) G. S. T. L. 21 (P & H)
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 14-5-2018
CWP No. 27168 of 2017 (O&M)
GST
MR. RAJESH BINDAL AND MR. DEEPAK SIBAL, JJ.
\nFor The Petitioner : Mr. Sandeep Goyal, Advocate And Ms. Tanish Peshawaria, DAG, Haryana
\nORDER
\nRAJESH BINDAL, J.
\nThe present writ has been filed impugning order dated 25.10.2017 passed by the Excise and Taxation Officer of State Tax, Hansicum- Proper Officer, under Section 129(1)(a) of Haryana Goods and Services Tax\/Central Goods and Services Tax of the Act, 2017. The writ petition was filed on 27.11.2017 with a grievance that under the Act n<\/p>\n
= = = = = = = =<\/p>\n
Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong> = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n ellate Authority has been constituted, the grievance to that extent has been rendered infructuous. = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong> = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" M\/s R.S. Steel Traders Versus State of Haryana and othersGST2018 (5) TMI 1649 – PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT – 2018 (16) G. S. T. L. 21 (P & H)PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT – HCDated:- 14-5-2018CWP No. 27168 of 2017 (O&M) GSTMR. RAJESH BINDAL AND MR. DEEPAK SIBAL, JJ. For The Petitioner : Mr. … Continue reading “M\/s R.S. Steel Traders Versus State of Haryana and others”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11959","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11959","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=11959"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11959\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=11959"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=11959"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=11959"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
For full text:-Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n
\nIn view of liberty granted vide order dated 07.02.2018, the petitioner has preferred appeal on 03.04.2018. The only grievance sought to be raised by learned counsel for the petitioner now is that the appeal may not be treated as time barred in terms of the provisions of Section 107 of the Act.
\nKeeping in view the aforesaid circumstances, as the petitioner could not file appeal earlier because of non-constitution of the Appellate Authority, which has now been appointed vide notification dated April 19, 2018, the appeal filed by the appellant shall not be dismissed only on account of delay.
\nThe present petition is disposed of accordingly.<\/p>\n
For full text:-Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n