{"id":11947,"date":"2018-05-23T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2018-05-22T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2018-05-23T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2018-05-22T18:30:00","slug":"m-s-bismi-timber-industries-versus-the-state-tax-officer-ii-state-goods-and-service-tax-department-perumbavoor-and-the-assistant-commissioner-appeals-ernakulam","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/?p=11947","title":{"rendered":"M\/s. BISMI TIMBER INDUSTRIES Versus THE STATE TAX OFFICER-II., STATE GOODS AND SERVICE TAX DEPARTMENT, PERUMBAVOOR AND THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (APPEALS), ERNAKULAM"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>M\/s. BISMI TIMBER INDUSTRIES Versus THE STATE TAX OFFICER-II., STATE GOODS AND SERVICE TAX DEPARTMENT, PERUMBAVOOR AND THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (APPEALS), ERNAKULAM<br \/>VAT and Sales Tax<br \/>2018 (5) TMI 1609 &#8211; KERALA HIGH COURT &#8211; TMI<br \/>KERALA HIGH COURT &#8211; HC<br \/>Dated:- 23-5-2018<br \/>W.P.(C).No.16709 of 2018 <br \/>CST, VAT &#038; Sales Tax<br \/>MR. P. B. SURESH KUMAR, J.<br \/>\nFor The Petitioner : SRI .N. Muraleedharan Nair And Smt.K. Hymavathy<br \/>\nFor The Respondent : V.K. Shamsudeen (SR.GP) And Sri.V.K. Shamsudheen<br \/>\nJUDGMENT<br \/>\nChallenging Ext.P1 assessment order under the Central Sales Tax Act (the Act), the petitioner preferred Ext.P2 appeal before the second respondent. There was a delay of 68 days in filing the appeal. Ext.P3 is the application preferr<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\"><strong>Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong><BR>For full text:-<a href=\"https:\/\/www.taxtmi.com\/caselaws?id=361045\">Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>M\/s. BISMI TIMBER INDUSTRIES Versus THE STATE TAX OFFICER-II., STATE GOODS AND SERVICE TAX DEPARTMENT, PERUMBAVOOR AND THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (APPEALS), ERNAKULAMVAT and Sales Tax2018 (5) TMI 1609 &#8211; KERALA HIGH COURT &#8211; TMIKERALA HIGH COURT &#8211; HCDated:- 23-5-2018W.P.(C).No.16709 of 2018 CST, VAT &#038; Sales TaxMR. P. B. SURESH KUMAR, J. For The Petitioner : &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/?p=11947\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;M\/s. BISMI TIMBER INDUSTRIES Versus THE STATE TAX OFFICER-II., STATE GOODS AND SERVICE TAX DEPARTMENT, PERUMBAVOOR AND THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (APPEALS), ERNAKULAM&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11947","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11947","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=11947"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11947\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=11947"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=11947"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=11947"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}