{"id":11936,"date":"2018-05-03T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2018-05-02T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2018-05-03T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2018-05-02T18:30:00","slug":"finolex-cables-ltd-thru-authorized-signatory-anr-versus-state-of-u-p-thru-prin-secy-registration-tax-2-others","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/?p=11936","title":{"rendered":"Finolex Cables Ltd., Thru. Authorized Signatory &#038; Anr. Versus State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy., Registration &#038; Tax &#038; 2 Others"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Finolex Cables Ltd., Thru. Authorized Signatory &#038; Anr. Versus State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy., Registration &#038; Tax &#038; 2 Others<br \/>GST<br \/>2018 (5) TMI 1553 &#8211; ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT &#8211; TMI<br \/>ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT &#8211; HC<br \/>Dated:- 3-5-2018<br \/>MISC. BENCH No. 12608 of 2018 <br \/>GST<br \/>Hon&#39;ble Shabihul Hasnain And Hon&#39;ble Rajan Roy, JJ.<br \/>\nFor the Petitioner : Neerav Chitravanshi<br \/>\nFor the Respondent : C.S.C.<br \/>\nORDER<br \/>\nHeard Shri Neerav Chitravanshi, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State.<br \/>\nThe petitioners have challenged the seizure order dated 11.04.2018 as contained in Annexure No. 1 to this writ petition.<br \/>\nThe petitioners say that their goods have been seized despite the fact that they had all the r<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\"><strong>Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong><BR>For full text:-<a href=\"https:\/\/www.taxtmi.com\/caselaws?id=360989\">Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Finolex Cables Ltd., Thru. Authorized Signatory &#038; Anr. Versus State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy., Registration &#038; Tax &#038; 2 OthersGST2018 (5) TMI 1553 &#8211; ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT &#8211; TMIALLAHABAD HIGH COURT &#8211; HCDated:- 3-5-2018MISC. BENCH No. 12608 of 2018 GSTHon&#39;ble Shabihul Hasnain And Hon&#39;ble Rajan Roy, JJ. For the Petitioner : Neerav Chitravanshi For &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/?p=11936\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Finolex Cables Ltd., Thru. Authorized Signatory &#038; Anr. Versus State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy., Registration &#038; Tax &#038; 2 Others&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11936","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11936","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=11936"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11936\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=11936"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=11936"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=11936"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}