{"id":11857,"date":"2018-03-19T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2018-03-18T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2018-03-19T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2018-03-18T18:30:00","slug":"victory-production-entertainment-p-ltd-versus-commissioner-of-cgst-mumbai","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/?p=11857","title":{"rendered":"Victory Production &#038; Entertainment P. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of CGST Mumbai."},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Victory Production &#038; Entertainment P. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of CGST Mumbai.<br \/>Service Tax<br \/>2018 (5) TMI 1221 &#8211; CESTAT MUMBAI &#8211; TMI<br \/>CESTAT MUMBAI &#8211; AT<br \/>Dated:- 19-3-2018<br \/>Appeal No. ST\/85617, 85618, 85620, 85621\/18 &#8211; A\/86158-86161\/2018<br \/>Service Tax<br \/>Mr. M. V. Ravindran, Member (Judicial)<br \/>\nShri Prashant Kandagal, Office Boy for appellant<br \/>\nShri V.R. Reddy, Asst. Commr (AR) for respondent<br \/>\nPer: M. V. Ravindran<br \/>\nThese four appeals are directed against order-in-appeal No. IM\/CGST A-III\/MUM\/166 to 169\/17-18 dated 10.10.2017.<br \/>\n2. An application for adjournment of the matter is received from the appellant.<br \/>\n3. On consideration of the application and perusal of records, I find that the appeals can be disposed of at this stage as t<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\"><strong>Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong><BR>For full text:-<a href=\"https:\/\/www.taxtmi.com\/caselaws?id=360657\">Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Victory Production &#038; Entertainment P. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of CGST Mumbai.Service Tax2018 (5) TMI 1221 &#8211; CESTAT MUMBAI &#8211; TMICESTAT MUMBAI &#8211; ATDated:- 19-3-2018Appeal No. ST\/85617, 85618, 85620, 85621\/18 &#8211; A\/86158-86161\/2018Service TaxMr. M. V. Ravindran, Member (Judicial) Shri Prashant Kandagal, Office Boy for appellant Shri V.R. Reddy, Asst. Commr (AR) for respondent Per: M. V. &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/?p=11857\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Victory Production &#038; Entertainment P. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of CGST Mumbai.&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11857","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11857","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=11857"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11857\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=11857"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=11857"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=11857"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}