M\/s Delhi Gujarat Fleet Carrier Pvt. Ltd Versus State Of U.P. And 4 Others
GST
2018 (5) TMI 696 – ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT – 2018 (13) G. S. T. L. 411 (All.)
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 1-5-2018
WRIT TAX No. 718 of 2018
GST
Hon'ble Krishna Murari And Hon'ble Ashok Kumar, JJ.
\nFor the Petitioner : Anand Kumar Singh
\nFor the Respondent : C.S.C.,A.S.G.I.
\nORDER
\nHeard Sri Anand Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri A.C. Tripathi, learned Standing Counsel.
\nPetitioner is a transporter and is challenging the seizure order dated 19.03.2018 and the consequential notice for levied of penalty dated 29.03.2018 issued under Section 129(3) of the UPGST Act, 2017.
\nBrief facts of the case are that the go<\/p>\n
= = = = = = = =<\/p>\n
Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong> = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n urse of verification, the vehicle in-charge failed to produce the Transit Declaration Form-I. = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong> = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" M\/s Delhi Gujarat Fleet Carrier Pvt. Ltd Versus State Of U.P. And 4 OthersGST2018 (5) TMI 696 – ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT – 2018 (13) G. S. T. L. 411 (All.)ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT – HCDated:- 1-5-2018WRIT TAX No. 718 of 2018 GSTHon'ble Krishna Murari And Hon'ble Ashok Kumar, JJ. For the Petitioner : Anand Kumar Singh … Continue reading “M\/s Delhi Gujarat Fleet Carrier Pvt. Ltd Versus State Of U.P. And 4 Others”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11746","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11746","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=11746"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11746\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=11746"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=11746"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=11746"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
For full text:-Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n
\nLearned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that though the transit declaration form is not required for the transportation of goods under the inter-state transaction but on insistence by the respondent no. 4 the person in-charge of the vehicle has downloaded the TDF-I on 22.03.2018 i.e. before the seizure proceedings are completed. However the penalty notice is also issued.
\nAgainst the seizure order an appeal was filed by the petitioner before the Additional Commissioner Grade-2 (Appeal)-III State Tax, Agra. The Additional Commissioner has affirmed the order of seizure while dismissing the appeal vide order dated 13.04.2018.
\nThe contention<\/p>\n
For full text:-Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n