{"id":11730,"date":"2018-05-05T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2018-05-04T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2018-05-05T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2018-05-04T18:30:00","slug":"pratik-satayanarayan-gattani-versus-union-of-india","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/?p=11730","title":{"rendered":"Pratik Satayanarayan Gattani Versus Union of India"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Pratik Satayanarayan Gattani Versus Union of India<br \/>GST<br \/>2018 (5) TMI 645 &#8211; GUJARAT HIGH COURT &#8211; TMI<br \/>GUJARAT HIGH COURT &#8211; HC<br \/>Dated:- 5-5-2018<br \/>Special Civil Application No. 7129 of 2018 <br \/>GST<br \/>MR. AKIL KURESHI AND MR. B.N. KARIA, JJ.<br \/>\nFor The Petitioner : Hiral U. Mehta, Nipun P. Singhvi and Vishal J. Dave, Advs.<br \/>\nORDER<br \/>\nAkil Kureshi, J. &#8211;<br \/>\nPetitioners have challenged the constitutional vires of Section 109 of the Central Goods &#038; Services Tax Act, 2017 as also that of the Gujarat Goods &#038; Services Tax Act, 2017 pertaining to constitution of the Central as well as State Appellate Tribunals. Main contention of the petitioners is that the Act envisages constitution of such Tribunals comprising of one Judicial and two Technical<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\"><strong>Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong><BR>For full text:-<a href=\"https:\/\/www.taxtmi.com\/caselaws?id=360081\">Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Pratik Satayanarayan Gattani Versus Union of IndiaGST2018 (5) TMI 645 &#8211; GUJARAT HIGH COURT &#8211; TMIGUJARAT HIGH COURT &#8211; HCDated:- 5-5-2018Special Civil Application No. 7129 of 2018 GSTMR. AKIL KURESHI AND MR. B.N. KARIA, JJ. For The Petitioner : Hiral U. Mehta, Nipun P. Singhvi and Vishal J. Dave, Advs. ORDER Akil Kureshi, J. &#8211; &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/?p=11730\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Pratik Satayanarayan Gattani Versus Union of India&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11730","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11730","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=11730"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11730\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=11730"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=11730"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=11730"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}