{"id":11686,"date":"2018-05-05T14:23:16","date_gmt":"2018-05-05T08:53:16","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2018-05-05T14:23:16","modified_gmt":"2018-05-05T08:53:16","slug":"high-court-rules-incomplete-e-way-bill-without-vehicle-number-doesn-39-t-justify-goods-seizure-quashes-section-129-3-order","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/?p=11686","title":{"rendered":"High Court rules incomplete e-way bill without vehicle number doesn&#39;t justify goods seizure; quashes Section 129(3) order."},"content":{"rendered":"<p>High Court rules incomplete e-way bill without vehicle number doesn&#39;t justify goods seizure; quashes Section 129(3) order.<br \/>Case-Laws<br \/>GST<br \/>Incomplete E-way bill &#8211; GST &#8211; Seizure of goods with vehicle &#8211; detention on the ground that Part-B of e-way bill was incomplete &#8211; Merely of none mentioning of the vehicle no. in Part-B cannot be a ground for seizure of the goods &#8211; Seizure order and SCN issued u\/s 129(3) quashed &#8211; HC<br \/> TMI Updates &#8211; Highlights, quick notes, marquee, annotation, news, a<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\"><strong>Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong><BR>For full text:-<a href=\"https:\/\/www.taxtmi.com\/highlights?id=39272\">Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>High Court rules incomplete e-way bill without vehicle number doesn&#39;t justify goods seizure; quashes Section 129(3) order.Case-LawsGSTIncomplete E-way bill &#8211; GST &#8211; Seizure of goods with vehicle &#8211; detention on the ground that Part-B of e-way bill was incomplete &#8211; Merely of none mentioning of the vehicle no. in Part-B cannot be a ground for &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/?p=11686\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;High Court rules incomplete e-way bill without vehicle number doesn&#39;t justify goods seizure; quashes Section 129(3) order.&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11686","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11686","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=11686"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11686\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=11686"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=11686"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=11686"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}