M\/s. Victory Paper And Boards (India) Ltd. Versus State Tax Officer, State Goods And Services Tax Department, Kunnamkulam
GST
2018 (5) TMI 456 – KERALA HIGH COURT – TMI
KERALA HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 27-4-2018
W. P. (C) No. 14526 of 2018
GST
MR. DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN, J.
\nFor The Petitioner : Sri. Tomson T.Emmanuel
\nFor The Respondents : Sri Ravikrishnan, Adv. And Sri V.K. Shamsudeen
\nJUDGMENT
\nThe petitioner impugns the action for recovery initiated by the competent authorities, subsequent to an order of assessment made against the petitioner, a copy of which has been appended to this writ petition as Ext.P2. According to the petitioner, against the order of assessment, he has already approached the appellate authority <\/p>\n
= = = = = = = =<\/p>\n
Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong> = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n der of stay may be granted, except on terms. = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong> = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" M\/s. Victory Paper And Boards (India) Ltd. Versus State Tax Officer, State Goods And Services Tax Department, KunnamkulamGST2018 (5) TMI 456 – KERALA HIGH COURT – TMIKERALA HIGH COURT – HCDated:- 27-4-2018W. P. (C) No. 14526 of 2018 GSTMR. DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN, J. For The Petitioner : Sri. Tomson T.Emmanuel For The Respondents : Sri Ravikrishnan, … Continue reading “M\/s. Victory Paper And Boards (India) Ltd. Versus State Tax Officer, State Goods And Services Tax Department, Kunnamkulam”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11680","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11680","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=11680"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11680\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=11680"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=11680"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=11680"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
For full text:-Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n
\n3. I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Government Pleader.
\n4. Taking note of the similar orders passed by this Court in analoguous situations, I am of the view that the petitioner can be given some respite from the rigor of recovery, at least until such time as the stay petition is considered by the appellate authority.
\n5. In such circumstances, I order this writ petition, directing the 2nd respondent to take up, consider and pass orders on Ext.P4 stay petition preferred by the petitioner, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Until such time as the 2nd respondent passes an order on <\/p>\n
For full text:-Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n