St. Josephs Tea Company Ltd Versus Chief Commissioner, Central GST & Central Excise Kerala Deputy Commissioner Of CGST, Goods & Services Tax Network, State Goods & Services Tax Department Government Of Kerala
GST
2018 (4) TMI 1290 – KERALA HIGH COURT – 2018 (16) G. S. T. L. 551 (Ker.)
KERALA HIGH COURT – HC
Dated:- 28-3-2018
WP(C). No. 768 of 2018
GST
P. B. Suresh Kumar, J.
\nFOR THE PETITIONER : SMT.NISHA JOHN
\nFOR THE RESPONDENT : SREELAL N. WARRIER, SC, CENTRAL BOARD OF EXCISE & CUSTOMS
\nJUDGMENT
\nPetitioner was a registered dealer under the Kerala Value Added Tax, now migrated to the Goods and Services Tax Act regime. Though they have applied for registration under the Goods and Services Tax statutes, they have <\/p>\n
= = = = = = = =<\/p>\n
Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong> = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n ourt on 19.02.2018, they have been granted registration with effect from 09.03.2018. = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong> = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" St. Josephs Tea Company Ltd Versus Chief Commissioner, Central GST & Central Excise Kerala Deputy Commissioner Of CGST, Goods & Services Tax Network, State Goods & Services Tax Department Government Of KeralaGST2018 (4) TMI 1290 – KERALA HIGH COURT – 2018 (16) G. S. T. L. 551 (Ker.)KERALA HIGH COURT – HCDated:- 28-3-2018WP(C). No. 768 … Continue reading “St. Josephs Tea Company Ltd Versus Chief Commissioner, Central GST & Central Excise Kerala Deputy Commissioner Of CGST, Goods & Services Tax Network, State Goods & Services Tax Department Government Of Kerala”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11557","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11557","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=11557"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11557\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=11557"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=11557"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=11557"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
For full text:-Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n
\n4. The subsisting grievance of the petitioner concerns their inability to comply with the requirements in terms of the statutes for the period from 01.07.2017 to 09.03.2018.
\n5. The learned counsel for respondents 1 and 2 submits that appropriate decision will be taken so as to enable the petitioner to comply with the statutory requirements for the period from 01.07.2017 to 09.03.2018 also, soon.
\nIn the light of the submission made by the learned counsel for respondents 1 and 2, the writ petition is disposed of directing respondents 1 and 2 to make appropriate changes in the portal so as to enable the petitioner to comply with the statutory requirements f<\/p>\n
For full text:-Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n