APPLICABILITY OF GST ON PAYMENT OF ACTUAL WAGES THROUGH LABOUR CONTRACTOR
Query (Issue) Started By: – GEE LIMITED Dated:- 12-4-2018 Last Reply Date:- 27-9-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GST
Got 10 Replies
GST
QUERY REGARDING GST APPLICABILITY ON PAYMENT OF WAGES TO INDIVIDUAL LABOURERS
\n * LABOUR CONTRACTOR PROVIDES WORKERS TO A FACTORY FOR MANUFACTURING OF GOODS.
\n * HE IS ISSUING THE FOLLOWING MONTHLY BILLS TO THE FACTORY
\nBILL NO.1 (APRIL 2018)
\nTotal Mandays
\nAmount
\nREIMBURSEMENT OF WAGES (ACTUALS WITH EMPLOYEE WISE DETAILS)
\n1664
\n670844
\nEPF – EMPLOYER CONTRIBUTION (ACTUALS)
\n39969
\nESI – EMPLOYER CONTRIBUTION (ACTUALS)
\n31866
\nTOTAL
\n742679
\nBILL NO.2 (APRIL 2018)
\nTotal Working Days
\nRate
\nAmount
\nCHARGES FOR PROVIDING LABOUR
\n1636
\n20
\n32720
\n(Total Mandays – Paid Holidays = Total Working Days)
\n * WHETHER THE CONTRACTOR IS LIABLE TO CHARGE GST ON BOTH THE BILLS OR WHETHER BILL NO.1 FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF ACTUAL WAGES, EPF AND ESI PAYMENTS WILL BE EXEMPTED FROM THE <\/p>\n
= = = = = = = =<\/p>\n
Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong> = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n II. = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong> = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n efore, A's recovery of such expenses is a disbursement and not part of the value of supply made by A to B. = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong> = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" APPLICABILITY OF GST ON PAYMENT OF ACTUAL WAGES THROUGH LABOUR CONTRACTOR Query (Issue) Started By: – GEE LIMITED Dated:- 12-4-2018 Last Reply Date:- 27-9-2018 Goods and Services Tax – GSTGot 10 RepliesGSTQUERY REGARDING GST APPLICABILITY ON PAYMENT OF WAGES TO INDIVIDUAL LABOURERS * LABOUR CONTRACTOR PROVIDES WORKERS TO A FACTORY FOR MANUFACTURING OF GOODS. * … Continue reading “APPLICABILITY OF GST ON PAYMENT OF ACTUAL WAGES THROUGH LABOUR CONTRACTOR”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11416","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11416","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=11416"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11416\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=11416"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=11416"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=11416"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
For full text:-Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n
\nReply By Rajagopalan Ranganathan:
\nThe Reply:
\nSir,
\nRule 33 of CGST Rules, 2017 states that-
\nNotwithstanding anything contained in the provisions of this Chapter, the expenditure or costs incurred by a supplier as a pure agent of the recipient of supply shall be excluded from the value of supply, if all the following conditions are satisfied, namely,-
\n (i) the supplier acts as a pure agent of the recipient of the supply, when he makes the payment to the third party on authorisation by such recipient;
\n (ii) the payment made by the pure agent on behalf of the recipient of supply has been separately indicated in the invoice issued by the pure agent to the recipient of service; and
\n (iii) the supplies procured by the pure agent from the third party as a pure agent of the recipient of supply are in addition to the services he supplies on his own account.
\nExplanation.- For the purposes of this rule, the expression “pure agent” means a person who-
\n (a) enters into a contractual agr<\/p>\n
For full text:-Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n
\nIn your case the supplier of manpower cannot be treated as 'pure agent' of you as per the definition given in the rule. Therefore the contractor is correct in charging gst on the entire amount charged by him towards supply of manpower.
\nReply By Susheel Gupta:
\nThe Reply:
\nEmployer of the contractual labour shall be the contractor not company. Moreover,as per ESI and PF records the employer shall be contractor. Therefor the transaction cannot be covered under Schedule III.
\nLabour contractor cannot be treated as pure agent since as per rule 33(iii) "the supplies procured by the pure agent from the third party as a pure agent of the recipient of supply are in addition to the services he supplies on his own account". In your case the contractor is not taking any additional services from the labour instead this is the primary services which the contractor is provid<\/p>\n
For full text:-Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n