{"id":11060,"date":"2017-08-25T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2017-08-24T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2017-08-25T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2017-08-24T18:30:00","slug":"m-s-saluja-motors-private-limited-versus-union-of-india-and-another","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/?p=11060","title":{"rendered":"M\/s Saluja Motors Private Limited Versus Union of India and another"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>M\/s Saluja Motors Private Limited Versus Union of India and another<br \/>GST<br \/>2018 (3) TMI 1152 &#8211; PUNJAB &#038; HARYANA HIGH COURT &#8211; [2017] 1 GSTL 3 (P&#038;HC)<br \/>PUNJAB &#038; HARYANA HIGH COURT &#8211; HC<br \/>Dated:- 25-8-2017<br \/>CWP-19205-2017 <br \/>GST<br \/>Mr. Ajay Kumar Mittal and Mr. Amit Rawal, J.<br \/>\nPresent: Mr. Sandeep Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner(s)<br \/>\nJUDGMENT<br \/>\nThe petitioner has approached this Court under Articles 226\/227 of the Constitution of India inter alia to issue writ in the nature of Certiorari\/Mandamus to declare Condition (iv) contained in Section 140 (3) of Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 insofar as it denies the Input Tax Credit of the eligible duties paid in respect of inputs held in stock purchased earlier than 12 months immedi<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\"><strong>Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong><BR>For full text:-<a href=\"https:\/\/www.taxtmi.com\/caselaws?id=357449\">Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>M\/s Saluja Motors Private Limited Versus Union of India and anotherGST2018 (3) TMI 1152 &#8211; PUNJAB &#038; HARYANA HIGH COURT &#8211; [2017] 1 GSTL 3 (P&#038;HC)PUNJAB &#038; HARYANA HIGH COURT &#8211; HCDated:- 25-8-2017CWP-19205-2017 GSTMr. Ajay Kumar Mittal and Mr. Amit Rawal, J. Present: Mr. Sandeep Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner(s) JUDGMENT The petitioner has approached &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/?p=11060\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;M\/s Saluja Motors Private Limited Versus Union of India and another&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11060","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11060","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=11060"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11060\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=11060"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=11060"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=11060"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}