{"id":10995,"date":"2017-10-26T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2017-10-25T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2017-10-26T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2017-10-25T18:30:00","slug":"mariyam-steels-versus-state-tax-officer-intelligence-inspector","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/?p=10995","title":{"rendered":"Mariyam Steels Versus State Tax Officer, (Intelligence Inspector)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Mariyam Steels Versus State Tax Officer, (Intelligence Inspector)<br \/>GST<br \/>2018 (3) TMI 969 &#8211; KERALA HIGH COURT &#8211; [2017] 1 GSTL 25 (Ker)<br \/>KERALA HIGH COURT &#8211; HC<br \/>Dated:- 26-10-2017<br \/>W. P. (C). No. 33734 of 2017 <br \/>GST<br \/>A.K. Jayasankaran Nambiar, J.<br \/>\nJUDGMENT<br \/>\nA consignment of M.S scrap, that was being transported at the instance of the petitioner, was detained by the respondents. Ext.P3 is the detention notice issued to the petitioner. In the writ petition, the petitioner is aggrieved by the insistence of the respondent that the petitioner must pay the security deposit demanded in the detention notice as a condition for release of the goods and vehicle.<br \/>\n2. I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and also the<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\"><strong>Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong><BR>For full text:-<a href=\"https:\/\/www.taxtmi.com\/caselaws?id=357266\">Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Mariyam Steels Versus State Tax Officer, (Intelligence Inspector)GST2018 (3) TMI 969 &#8211; KERALA HIGH COURT &#8211; [2017] 1 GSTL 25 (Ker)KERALA HIGH COURT &#8211; HCDated:- 26-10-2017W. P. (C). No. 33734 of 2017 GSTA.K. Jayasankaran Nambiar, J. JUDGMENT A consignment of M.S scrap, that was being transported at the instance of the petitioner, was detained by &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/?p=10995\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Mariyam Steels Versus State Tax Officer, (Intelligence Inspector)&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-10995","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10995","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=10995"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10995\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=10995"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=10995"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=10995"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}