{"id":10831,"date":"2018-01-15T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2018-01-14T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2018-01-15T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2018-01-14T18:30:00","slug":"m-s-sify-technologies-versus-the-commissioner-of-gst-and-ce-chennai-south-commissionerate","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/?p=10831","title":{"rendered":"M\/s. Sify Technologies Versus The Commissioner of GST And CE Chennai South Commissionerate"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>M\/s. Sify Technologies Versus The Commissioner of GST And CE Chennai South Commissionerate<br \/>Service Tax<br \/>2018 (3) TMI 456 &#8211; CESTAT CHENNAI &#8211; TMI<br \/>CESTAT CHENNAI &#8211; AT<br \/>Dated:- 15-1-2018<br \/>ST\/MISC\/41713\/17 in ST\/184\/2012 &#8211; A\/40018\/2018<br \/>Service Tax<br \/>Ms. Sulekha Beevi C.S., Member (Judicial) And Shri Madhu Mohan Damodhar, Member (Technical)<br \/>\nMs. Sweta Giridhar, Advocate &#8211; for the Appellant<br \/>\nShri S. Govindarajan, AC (AR) &#8211; for the Respondent<br \/>\nORDER<br \/>\nPer: Sulekha Beevi C.S.<br \/>\nThe above miscellaneous application has been filed by the department seeking amendment of the cause title on the ground that the department is shown in the above appeal with jurisdiction of the Commissioner of Service Tax, LTU, Chennai, whereas now the same has <\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\"><strong>Plain text (Extract) only<\/strong><BR>For full text:-<a href=\"https:\/\/www.taxtmi.com\/caselaws?id=356753\">Visit the Source <\/a><\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">=  =  =  =  =  =  =  =<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>M\/s. Sify Technologies Versus The Commissioner of GST And CE Chennai South CommissionerateService Tax2018 (3) TMI 456 &#8211; CESTAT CHENNAI &#8211; TMICESTAT CHENNAI &#8211; ATDated:- 15-1-2018ST\/MISC\/41713\/17 in ST\/184\/2012 &#8211; A\/40018\/2018Service TaxMs. Sulekha Beevi C.S., Member (Judicial) And Shri Madhu Mohan Damodhar, Member (Technical) Ms. Sweta Giridhar, Advocate &#8211; for the Appellant Shri S. Govindarajan, AC &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/?p=10831\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;M\/s. Sify Technologies Versus The Commissioner of GST And CE Chennai South Commissionerate&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-10831","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10831","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=10831"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10831\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=10831"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=10831"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodsandservicetax.in\/GST\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=10831"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}